Index funds continue to outperform the majority of active managers over time, but a blend of passive and active funds can be a powerful combination.
The Australian share market ended 2022 lower than where it started the year, and in between it was a bumpy ride for investors.
Over 251 trading days, the S&P/ASX 200 index (which tracks the top 200 listed companies on the Australian Securities Exchange) closed higher than the previous trading session 138 times and lower 113 times.
And there were some sizeable daily swings last year. In 81 trading sessions the Australian share market either rose or fell by 1 per cent or more.
Which begs a question. Rather than investing in a “passive” index-tracking exchange traded fund or managed fund that delivers the share market return, minus costs, is it better to invest in actively managed funds that hand-pick companies so they can try and outperform the share market?
Active versus index
The 2022 results of Australian active fund managers’ performance, compiled by global share market index provider Standard & Poor’s, have just been released.
The Australian share market, using the S&P/ASX 200 index as the measure, fell by close to 6 per cent in 2022. Index funds investing in all of the top 200 companies on the ASX also delivered negative returns.
But the S&P Indices versus Active (SPIVA) scorecard shows that more than half (58 per cent) of actively managed Australian Equity General Funds – that is, funds that invest in a selection of large Australian companies chosen by an investment team – fared worse than the broader Australian share market.
Over the longer term, underperformance rates were even higher, with 81.2 per cent, 78.2 per cent and 83.6 per cent of funds underperforming the S&P/ASX 200 index over the 5-, 10- and 15-year horizons, respectively.
A large number of active fund managers also failed to outperform other segments of the share market last year, and over longer periods.
Percentage of funds outperformed by the index (based on absolute return)
| Fund Category | Comparison Index | 1-Year (%) | 3-Year (%) | 5-Year (%) | 10-Year (%) | 15-Year (%) |
| Australian Equity General | S&P ASX 200 | 57.56 | 65.32 | 81.18 | 78.22 | 83.57 |
| Australian Equity Mid- and Small-Cap | S&P ASX Mid-Small | 76.62 | 68.53 | 68.12 | 66.67 | – |
| International Equity General | S&P Developed Ex-Australia LargeMidCap | 56.29 | 80.78 | 86.25 | 95.00 | 94.30 |
| Australian Bonds | S&P Australian Fixed Interest 0+ Index | 69.23 | 52.94 | 66.13 | – | – |
| Australian Equity A-REIT | S&P/ASX 200 A-REIT | 41.18 | 61.54 | 65.67 | 79.22 | 79.12 |
Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Morningstar. Data for periods ending 30 December 2022. Outperformance is based on equal-weighted fund counts. Index performance based on total return. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Underperformance rates for Australian Bonds and Australian Equity Mid- and Small-Cap categories are reporting for time horizons over which the respected benchmark indices were live.
On the surface, it could be easy to reach a conclusion that investing in low-cost passive index funds tracking broader sections of the share market can deliver higher returns than active funds.
But consider that, by reversing the percentages in the SPIVA table, a large number of active managers did actually outperform the broader market in 2022.
And, although the underperformance percentages do get higher over the longer term, it’s evident that some active managers have been able to deliver higher-than-market returns over periods of time.
The active-passive decision framework
Having a blend of index and active funds in a portfolio can be a powerful investment combination.
Investment strategies designed to achieve broad diversification and to lower portfolio volatility often use both passive index funds and active funds and are framed around what’s known as a “core and satellite” approach.
In many cases this approach involves having most of one’s portfolio invested into passive core investments on the basis these can deliver consistent long-term returns with reduced volatility. Smaller allocations can be directed to actively managed satellite investments that have the potential to deliver higher growth.
In essence, any decision to employ a core and satellite strategy – and how much active risk you are willing to take on – largely comes down to your overall risk tolerance.
Making an active choice
Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all formula for investors when it comes to passive versus active allocation.
A sensible approach to active management allocation needs to focus on talent, cost, and patience.
Talent is about carefully selecting managers with proven processes and demonstrable investment abilities and this is where we can help.
Actively managed funds that have shown better performance returns over time are those run by experienced and talented managers, that have low-cost structures, and that take a patient rather than reactive investment approach.
Cost is also key, and it’s a factor you can control by focusing on managers that have low fees.
Thirdly, patience is fundamental to long-term investment performance.
While low costs and a rigorous, considered manager selection process can go a long way to improve your results using active management, those benefits can be eroded significantly if a manager fails to maintain a long-term investment perspective.
In short, investing is not simply a passive or active choice. It’s about making the best choices and finding the right balance for you.
Using a licensed financial adviser to find the right asset allocation balance, based on your personal investment goals and tolerance for risk, is a very good starting point.
We can help! Talk to us today if you’d like to find out more about investing. Contact us on 1300 79 80 38.
If you would like assistance getting your accounts under control as we approach the end of financial year, call us today on 1300 79 80 38.
Visit our Financial Knowledge Centre where you will access educational videos and articles, plus join our monthly e-Newsletter to help improve your financial knowledge.
If this article interested you and you would like to speak to Pat Casey on the phone, select a time to speak Pat – Financial Planner Sydney.
At Assure Wealth we specialise in helping busy, successful families structure their finances to achieve greater wealth and financial peace of mind.
Author: Pat Casey – Managing Director & Financial Planner Sydney – Assure Wealth
Download the Assure Wealth Corporate Brochure
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website has been provided as general advice only. We have not considered your financial circumstances, needs or objectives and you should seek the assistance of your Walker Lane Pty Ltd Adviser before you make any decision regarding any products mentioned in this communication. Whilst all care has been taken in the preparation of this material, no warranty is given in respect of the information provided and accordingly neither Walker Lane nor its related entities, employees or agents shall be liable on any ground whatsoever with respect to decisions or actions taken as a result of you acting upon such information.
Assure Wealth Pty Ltd ABN 31 965 466 780 Corporate Authorised Representative no. 1244817, Patrick Casey Sub-Authorised Representative no. 1244748 of Walker Lane Pty Ltd ABN 70 626 199 826, an AFSL holder No 509305.
